User talk:Liz.go
| This user is a student editor in UC_Berkeley/Grappling_with_Global_Poverty_(Spring_2018) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Liz.go, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Area: International Rescue Committee This article is noted to have a problem regarding its narrative voice; the narrative voice is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. However, you do help solve this problem with the inclusion and expansion of revenue information. This can be seen as a public report of how and where the committee spends its funds, this will help the article to be seen less of a press release and more of an informative article. In addition, there are some contents where supplemental information is needed. One of these include the resettlement section that you are editing, this helps the article to have more information on the topics it want to educate. Sector: Refugee Law This article has many problems that make the it seem more jagged. The most prominent one is the listed resources. The resources are listed but are not incorporated into the article in a concise manner. It would be best if the information in the resources could be written in the article, and then have the resources be listed as references. What you have written for the definition of refugee law will most certainly help in this process. Furthermore, the section you have for refugee status determination can be added into the article as its own separate section. Procedure fairness can also be its own section, but only if you wish to add more information. -Sigyn22
Peer Review
[edit]Area: International Rescue Committee
[edit]This article is noted to have a problem regarding its narrative voice; the narrative voice is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. However, you do help solve this problem with the inclusion and expansion of revenue information. This can be seen as a public report of how and where the committee spends its funds, this will help the article to be seen less of a press release and more of an informative article. In addition, there are some contents where supplemental information is needed. One of these include the resettlement section that you are editing, this helps the article to have more information on the topics it want to educate.
Sector: Refugee Law
[edit]This article has many problems that make the it seem more jagged. The most prominent one is the listed resources. The resources are listed but are not incorporated into the article in a concise manner. It would be best if the information in the resources could be written in the article, and then have the resources be listed as references. What you have written for the definition of refugee law will most certainly help in this process. Furthermore, the section you have for refugee status determination can be added into the article as its own separate section. Procedure fairness can also be its own section, but only if you wish to add more information. -Sigyn22
Peer Review
[edit]Area: International Rescue Committee This article is noted to have a problem regarding its narrative voice; the narrative voice is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. However, you do help solve this problem with the inclusion and expansion of revenue information. This can be seen as a public report of how and where the committee spends its funds, this will help the article to be seen less of a press release and more of an informative article. In addition, there are some contents where supplemental information is needed. One of these include the resettlement section that you are editing, this helps the article to have more information on the topics it want to educate.
Sector: Refugee Law This article has many problems that make it seem more jagged. The most prominent one is the listed resources. The resources are listed but are not incorporated into the article in a concise manner. It would be best if the information in the resources could be written in the article, and then have the resources be listed as references. What you have written for the definition of refugee law will most certainly help in this process. Furthermore, the section you have for refugee status determination can be added into the article as its own separate section. Procedure fairness can also be its own section, but only if you wish to add more information. -Sigyn22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigyn22 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Mary O'Kane
[edit]Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.unhcr.org/4317223c9.pdf or elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please review the Plagiarism and Copyright training module before proceeding further. Thanks. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)