Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lia Morán

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:18, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lia Morán

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted by PROD, re-created by same author. Fails WP:GNG (no significant coverage) and WP:NFOOTBALL (never played in a fully-professional league). Giant Snowman 10:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 10:22, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I hardly think a 15 year old kid passes GNG or NFooty. Govvy (talk) 19:26, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, WP:NSPORTS - "This page in a nutshell: An athlete is presumed to be notable if the person has actively participated in a major amateur or professional competition...", if Liga MX Femenil is indeed "the highest division of women's football in Mexico.", is it not a "major" competition? Coolabahapple (talk) 02:45, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFOOTBALL requires "fully-professional" - this is not. Giant Snowman 08:03, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

agree, but wp:nsport does not ie. "Please note that the failure to meet these criteria does not mean an article must be deleted; conversely, the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. These are merely rules of thumb which some editors choose to keep in mind when deciding whether or not to keep an article.." Coolabahapple (talk) 13:58, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NFOOTBALL is a more specific guide than NSPORT - and the other alternative is meeting GNG, which this does not do either. On what grounds would you consider this topic to be notable? Giant Snowman 14:14, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i dont, hence the "comment" not "keep", thanks for clarifying things. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:45, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, the article says she hasn't actually played a game in the league, so it's irrelevant whether doing so would make her notable. As I've explained on other similar AfD's, I think it would, but in this case, that's irrelevant. Smartyllama (talk) 16:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 11:48, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTBALL having never played in a fully professional league and does not have enough significant independent coverage to meet WP:GNG. Kosack (talk) 08:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Has not actually played in the Liga MX Feminil, so whether doing so would make her notable is a moot point. Smartyllama (talk) 12:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.