Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nike Multi-Turf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 05:08, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nike Multi-Turf

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's always a bad sign when the first 5 search results about a subject are mirrors of its Wikipedia entry - there's almost no coverage about this at all, anywhere. This article is blatant advertising and is everything Wikipedia is not. Exemplo347 (talk) 22:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 02:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 10:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - all hits are either: the store itself, secondary stores, blatant adverts elsewhere and wiki duplicates. The article itself is WP:PROMO. The article is actually eligible for speedy Nosebagbear (talk) 12:18, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it's a football, and probably a very good one, but there's no discussion in reliable sources which elevates it above other footballs in terms of notability. Neiltonks (talk) 12:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Nike, Inc.#Products There is also a range of football boots classed as Multi-Turf which are boots that can be used both on astro and grass. So delete and redirect as a possible search term. Govvy (talk) 22:45, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.