User talk:General Ization

PLEASE READ

If I have nominated your article for deletion, removed your content or reverted your change and you would like to know why,
please review the following Wikipedia policies and guidelines, among others that may be mentioned in a message I left on your Talk page:

WP:N (General Notability)
WP:BIO (Person Notability)
WP:ORG (Company or Group Notability)
WP:WEB (Web Content Notability)
WP:BLP (Biographies of living persons policies)

WP:MUSIC (Musician or Band Notability)
WP:V (Verifiability)
WP:RS (Reliable Sources)
WP:COPY (Copyright)

If none of these pages addresses your concerns,
you can leave me a note.
If you do, please sign and date your post by typing four tildes: ~~~~.

If you can't be bothered to do any of this, please do not post on my page.

This is General Ization's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27: 31 days

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

General Ization is trying to take a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon. Most likely, however, General Ization will not be able to keep away from Wikipedia for that long, and will probably be back a lot earlier while making some small edits every once in a while anyway.

Curious to understand

This removal [[1]]. Please ping me here or respond on my talk page. warmly Sethie (talk) 04:59, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page spammer is Haiyenslna. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sethie: Please see Special:Contributions/Kim_Mai_13 and it should be clear. General Ization ^Talk 11:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Balsamo in Korn

Why Terry Balsamo wasn't member of Korn? Joseph Saleem (talk) 03:30, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for informing of Wikipedia's source policies. Also, may I ask out of curiosity how you found and corrected my edit after only a minute of me posting it? You also happened to be the same user who reverted my edit to the Massachusetts page in July of 2017. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frank Palpatine (talk • contribs) 01:18, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Frank Palpatine: It happens that both Massachusetts and WikiHow are on my Watchlist. General Ization ^Talk 01:22, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, General Ization. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 20:00, 1 May 2018 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Home Lander (talk) 20:00, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Home Lander: I already submitted a request concerning the Curry edit. Thanks. General Ization ^Talk 20:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).

Administrator changes

None

Chochopk • Coffee • Gryffindor • Jimp • Knowledge Seeker • Lankiveil • Peridon • Rjd0060

Guideline and policy news

The ability to create articles directly in mainspace is now indefinitely restricted to autoconfirmed users.
A proposal is being discussed which would create a new "event coordinator" right that would allow users to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit.

Technical news

AbuseFilter has received numerous improvements, including an OOUI overhaul, syntax highlighting, ability to search existing filters, and a few new functions. In particular, the search feature can be used to ensure there aren't existing filters for what you need, and the new equals_to_any function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to Logstash.
When blocking anonymous users, a cookie will be applied that reloads the block if the user changes their IP. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. This currently only occurs when hard-blocking accounts.
The block notice shown on mobile will soon be more informative and point users to a help page on how to request an unblock, just as it currently does on desktop.
There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

Arbitration

The Arbitration Committee is seeking additional clerks to help with the arbitration process.

Obituaries

Lankiveil (Craig Franklin) passed away in mid-April. Lankiveil joined Wikipedia on 12 August 2004 and became an administrator on 31 August 2008. During his time with the Wikimedia community, Lankiveil served as an oversighter for the English Wikipedia and as president of Wikimedia Australia.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i have done my work

so i can do my own thing it is not your problem or is it just stop sending warning s or stop board ok it is annoying — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amoab.k01 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Amoab.k01: As an example: "a mixture is like a seperating thing to seperate like sand and water so first it will boil so then it will start making small bubbles. then it can evaporate so it will be start the bubbles and then you should see only lots of sand" at Mixture is not encyclopedic content in English. Unless you can be bothered to use proper English grammar, capitalization, punctuation and spelling, at the very least, please don't edit here at the English Wikipedia. General Ization ^Talk 20:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You edited an edit, on Yahweh, why?

Do you disagree that Israelites distinguish themselves from Canaanites by 11 generations of heritage? And that ancient Canaanites distinguish themselves from Israelites? The term Canaanite is a primarily biblical term used to describe inhabitants of the Levant before the Israeli conquest And if memory serves, it was a Canaanite tribe that first described descendants of Terah as “Hebrews” (wonderers, travelers, foreigners, nomads) So we have a term “Canaanites” that has its primary sorce from biblical texts (see the wiki page for canaanites) And we have that biblical text differentiating Israelites from the Canaanites And we have the Canaanites differentiating themselves from the Israelites in the same text But you wont allow an edit explaining how the very text that we recieve the terms “Canaanite” and “Israelite” differentiate them

Also, who is it that believes the Israelites were originally Canaanites The very next sentance on the wiki page makes the theological distinction between the two people groups And on the Canaanite wiki page, there theology is there defining factor (search Canaanites in google and the first wiki page to populate is about the pantheon, not their geographic location)

Words matter, and these words have a source, and that source makes a specific differentiation between “Canaanite” and “Israelite”

The wiki page is wrong by any measurable standard

– — ° ′ ″ ≈ ≠ ≤ ≥ ± − × ÷ ← → · § 73.58.158.75 (talk) 19:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC) Caleb May 16, 2018[reply]

Since you (using this IP) did not perform the edit I reverted, I'm not sure what your relationship is to the edit. See the Talk page of the IP that did perform the edit for the reason it was reverted. General Ization ^Talk 20:30, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 “Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users.”

Im confused, are you saying that because i dont have a username, you reverted the page? Thats a terrible standard , how about we edit based on the validity of the information

And i assure you, the edit and comment were made by the same person, me — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1003:B44B:AD60:457C:442F:6AA7:BB34 (talk) 21:05, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No; that's not what the message I left on the IP's page says, is it? Read the message I left there. The information you quoted is included on any IP's Talk page. It has nothing to do with the warning I posted there. I can't be responsible for your ability to understand it, and I'm not going to engage in a debate with multiple IPs over it, whether or not they are "you". General Ization ^Talk 22:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have listed this dispute on a dispute resolution page

The link is here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:General_Ization#/talk/9 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:803:C401:BA88:E19C:9060:17AC:80EF (talk) 02:22, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You know, instead of attempting to cite obscure bi laws of wiki to new users, you could actually explain the system and help people get good information on the site Instead you lead someone who has better information than that presented to instigate a dispute resolution on their first day of attempting to edit bad information

Also, if you see the source, which i know you have because you delted it twice from your talk page and site another users page that it was listed on, and its in my description of the events that transpired, and the source is legitimate, why are you still fighting this??

Its a contentious statement and all i aksed was that it be worded differently for the sake of accuracy