Jump to content

User talk:NZFC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jazzidiot (talk | contribs) at 06:16, 16 June 2018. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my talk page! Please feel free to bring discussions here from other pages, but please use a quote. This page is archived by User:Lowercase sigmabot III. If you leave me a message on my talk page, I will reply on my talk page, so you may want to watch this page. I check my watchlist regularly. I usually add talk pages to my watchlist if I comment on them. ' Thank you.

Greenhithe Catimba

Greenhithe Catimba
Hello Nz Football Conscience, I notice you block my edit for Greenhithe... please refer to the link you send https://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/local-news/north-harbour-news/99547019/football-club-to-offer-senior-pathways-for-local-players, if you read it properly It mention Catimba Joining Greenhithe, please also refer to http://www.nff.org.nz/newsarticle/62586 where the football federation name us Greenhithe Catimba, as from 2018 Greenhithe senior team First and reserves is Called Greenhithe Catimba ... Thank you Salvamar84 (talk) 04:23, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Salvamar84, I understand the top teams are named Greenhithe Catimba and that is fine, but Wikipedia uses the actually name of the organisation and not the nickname. As per the news article you linked "In readiness for senior teams, the club also changed its name from Greenhithe Junior Football Club to Greenhithe Football Club in 2016.". What I would do for the page you have created is call it Greenhithe FC and have a sentence on the page stating the clubs first and reserve team are called Greenhithe Catimba or maybe the clubs nickname is Greenhithe Catimba and they are an amateur association football club in the suburb of Greenhithe, Auckland, New Zealand. NZFC(talk) 04:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My edits

Hi. Please understand that my edits to the SHINee page were made out of respect to the deceased and to the remaining members of the group who wish to acknowledge SHINee as five. I have also edited the language of the page which implies SHINee never consisted of five members as that is inaccurate. Please allow this to stand, as I am only respecting the wishes of those closest to the deceased artist by ensuring that the image published in their name accurately reflects the group's view of themselves. Additionally, please allow this to stand because it most accurately represents the group in this past decade. Message me with any concerns, I'm still unsure how the communication here works. Thank you and have a really great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213roses (talk • contribs) 23:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, Wikipedia only reports facts and the fact is that the band is only four members now and we don't use flowery language. We say he is dead, not passed away. See the talk page for this. Do not keep changing it or you'll be blocked. NZFC(talk) 23:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


"Sources"

Just a heads up but if you insisted that you go off sources, try actually extrapolating the information from the source. Saying something in paragraph one and retracting it on paragraph 7 doesn't establish the claim as "sourced". Just thought you should know. 2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC (talk) 03:10, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my mistake. Saying something in sentence 4 and admittedly discrediting it in sentence 5 does not make for "cited claim" on a wiki page. Had to be more specific to display how little effort was put into your revision. 2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC (talk) 03:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC Seems another user disagrees with you also. If you want to change what is written there, instead of reverting them. I suggest you take it too the talk page to discuss. NZFC(talk) 03:24, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's not that much to disagree on when you actually reference the "sourced material". It's not subjective in the slightest, the wording of that "source" spells out it cannot establish the number it just quoted you. 2601:807:8100:D910:E15C:5934:3A41:68BC (talk) 03:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I pinged you but I am not sure it came through. I have added comments to the talk page of the article. I also show by references to the Ford's Theater restoration document from 1962 that the capacity was somewhere in the vicinity of 1,700. Donner60 (talk) 04:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

you need to stop trying to get pages deleted that are notable and provide reliable sources from first hand parties. as you did with Jersey Crew Soccer Club and Sam Allington — Preceding unsigned comment added by Footballandsoccer (talk • contribs) 06:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Footballandsoccer you have to leave the deletion discussion tags on the articles. If they are notable then they will be voted there to keep. I suggest you read deletion process. Unfortunately it appears neither article is notable as per WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG.

Re Ross Porter. If you are going to make edits or additions then provide balanced accurate reporting and tell the complete story You are amateurish and represent yellow journalism and opening yourself up to libel and defamation. Continue if would like litigation expedited Jazzidiot (talk) 06:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NZFC&oldid=846086158"