Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streamr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:37, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Streamr

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about an unremarkable blockchain-related company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Possibly undisclosed native advertising in violation of the terms of use. MER-C 14:05, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for subject not meeting WP:NCORP. Lately, we seem to be up to our necks with corporate promotions and whatnot. Wikipedia, on account of its very success, has become a source of significant revenue for some folks. -The Gnome (talk) 15:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Gnome. My major concern is the combination of native advertising and an ICO. That's at least one step too far. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 22:28, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw what you did there.

-The Gnome (talk) 19:04, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.