Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PayTabs

PayTabs

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory-like listing for an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is routine notices, passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi kauffman. Thanks for the points.

I believe there is significant coverage by independent articles. There is also a lack of information of Fintech companies in the middle east. Hence the proposal to add this article.

Please do let me know what needs to be amended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkshots (talk • contribs) 23:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:31, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bahrain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:31, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Raju, please do clarify whats missing within the required sourcing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkshots (talk • contribs) 23:37, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - promotional.Deb (talk) 13:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Enough there to satisfy WP:GNG in my opinion. Govvy (talk) 15:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Technically it is WP:NCORP that applies, but the Zawya/Reuters and Arab News sources at a minimum look of good quality and sufficient to pass NCORP even without looking too far afield. It it a little promotional (though not wildly so) but certainly has encylopedic worth - I wouldn't say that either WP:DEL4 or WP:G11 applies. Thus promo tones should be dealt with by editing, not deletion. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:45, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Reference 1,6,7 and 10 are not valid as per Wiki standards. When I google, a lot of coverage pops up. So I think it may satisfy independent coverage criteria. But its clearly promotional. Not sure if the right disclosure was done. Globe2trotter (talk) 18:26, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]