User talk:TaxPapa

Welcome

Hello, Wikitaxeditor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marshall I. Whitley (attorney) (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProgrammingGeek was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marshall I. Whitley (attorney) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marshall I. Whitley (attorney), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProgrammingGeek^talktome 01:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikitaxeditor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ProgrammingGeek^talktome 01:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for promotional user name

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you.

Template:Z15

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TaxPapa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

TaxPapa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Understand that previous username of WikiTaxEditor may not have been acceptable under Wikipedia policies, and apologize for unintentional and inadvertent potential violation. New name of TaxPapa has been approved. Please unblock. TaxPapa (talk) 17:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Now that you've been renamed, you can be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 22:49, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:07, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Academy of Matrimonial Attorneys (AAML) (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. The organization's website is a primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Attorneys (AAML) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Attorneys (AAML), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Attorneys (AAML) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:American Academy of Matrimonial Attorneys (AAML). Thanks! John from Idegon (talk) 04:07, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:John from Idegon, you may be blocked from editing. John from Idegon (talk) 06:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not post on my talk page again. Shakespeare was a pretty smart fella. John from Idegon (talk) 06:30, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John from Idegon Thank you again for your helpful comments. I was attempting to thank you on your talk page. As I mentioned, I clearly am new to all of this, and your input will be helpful as I move forward in the future. TaxPapa (talk) 06:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 3 2018

I am in process of better familiarizing myself with Wikipedia:Your first article and other helpful material. Please be patient and understanding as I continue to learn all the rules. TaxPapa (talk) 06:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]