Talk:Daphnis (moon)
![]() | Astronomy: Astronomical objects Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
![]() | Astronomy: Solar System Unassessed | ||||||||||||
|
![]() | Spoken Wikipedia | |||
|
Name
In Liddell & Scott, Greek nominative daphnis, genitive daphnidos: bayberry, bay-tree (laurel tree).
"Daphnis" (daf'-nis) is cognate with the name Daphne (daf'-nee), Greek daphnê, the nymph named after the laurel tree. There does not appear to be an adjectival form of Daphnis in English, but the regular derivation would be from the Greek genitive, so we could expect Daphnidian (daf-nid'-ee-un). The English adjectival form of Daphne in the dictionaries, by contrast, is "Daphnean" (daf'-nee-un), from Greek daphnaios, Latin daphnæus.
kwami 22:31, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
discovery date
Just wondering what is the usual convention used among all these satellites for the discovery date? The date of publication or date of first observation? For example Daphnis here, has the publication date in the infobox. Deuar 22:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Spoken Wikipedia recording
I've just uploaded an audio recording of the article. Please let me know if I've mispronounced anything. :-) --Mangst (talk) 01:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Bug in Celestia
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/19/Daphnis_Celestia.jpg/250px-Daphnis_Celestia.jpg)
I don't know if this is relevant, but in Celestia version 1.6.0 for Windows XP, when one tries to go to Daphnis, a ring appears to slice through the moon. I think it's a bug. (I could do a picture...) Lanthanum-138 (talk) 06:57, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Daphnis (moon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721230358/http://oldenhuis.info/Reports&Articles/Daphnis/daphnis.PDF to http://oldenhuis.info/Reports&Articles/Daphnis/daphnis.PDF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Is the term "gravitational waves" correct?
On the 1st image, the description says: "Daphnis was resolved into a disc for the first time in this 2005 Cassini probe image. The gravitational waves on the edges of the rings, which had earlier hinted at the moon's presence, are clearly visible.[6]".
I don't know enough about this subjet, but is "gravitational waves" the correct term?
- Start-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
- Unassessed Astronomy articles
- Unknown-importance Astronomy articles
- Unassessed Astronomy articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed Solar System articles
- Unknown-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force