Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women Disobey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Just about agreement that GNG/NEVENT are satisfied. Also agreement that a merge discussion might be warranted, which can be raised in the usual fashion (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 22:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Women Disobey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very low turnout and no impact. Fails WP:NEVENT as there is no WP:SUSTAINED or WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, not to mention this fails WP:GEOSCOPE. wumbolo ^^^ 10:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 13:44, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments I read through the article, I am not sure how relevant this particular protect sits in with other protects. I am not sure if the title is helping or not. There were over 4,000 views of the article end of July, but now there doesn't appear to be much viewership now which suggests the article and topic really are not that big a deal. I am also going to disregard WP:GNG, it's probably better to have an article Protests during the Trump administration. Govvy (talk) 14:01, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm satisfied that the GNG is met in this case; per WP:PRESERVE, the content could alternatively be merged into Protests against the Trump administration family separation policy, where this is listed as a "main article" for one section. XOR'easter (talk) 17:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 07:56, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep since article passes GNG. Xoreaster's suggestion seems more appropriate than deletion. Rab V (talk) 08:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, gidonb (talk) 06:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep minor protest, low-turnout for a national, protest in D.C. There have been so many Protests against Donald Trump. Above-average number of arrests. Coverage probably scrapes by EVENT.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.