Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceepeecee, British Columbia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ∯WBG^converse 05:40, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ceepeecee, British Columbia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NGEO. A memoir-coverage in a local-publication. Seeking redirect to Vancouver Island. ∯WBG^converse 14:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:47, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:47, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It seems to be a former populated place, once significant. Once notable always notable. --Doncram (talk) 06:00, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. According to BC Geographical Names, its status is "official"[1], and it was populated. Just enough verifiable history to satisfy WP:GEOLAND, IMO. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:14, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-Shortly.∯WBG^converse 12:30, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, a couple of books that may discuss/mention ceepeecee: Vanishing British Columbia - gbooks doesnt show relevant pages, Cannery Village, Company Town (self published?). Coolabahapple (talk) 14:17, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Was formerly populated (e.g. I see a first aid station and a port in the sources, mention of Indian shacks and employee houses, as well as one source saying a population of 1,500 at the peak - but not sure if that the cannery or the area around the island) - so it would meet WP:GEOLAND. Regardless, it also seems to meet GNG rifling through various gbook hits - [2][3][4][5]. Icewhiz (talk) 16:06, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.