User talk:Cameron11598

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by .

Question re: Fred Bauder ArbCom case

Would you be comfortable using the table format for the voting summary? I find it very much easier to read and get a sense of where the case is currently at.

Thanks for considering it, even if in the end you prefer not to use it.

Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:31, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken: I'll look into it! I haven't used it before (at least I don't think I have) so I'll let you know shortly! --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 06:33, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks very much. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:34, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken: went with that style. Should reflect on the page shortly. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 06:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving to a redlink?

Jayzus. Qwirkle (talk) 19:03, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ya know what I did @Qwirkle:, I copy pasted the actual web address instead of the page link and followed with double brackets instead of single brackets. A silly mistake but hopefully people understand or are able to make the connection but I'll post a null edit to do a new archive link. Regards, --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 19:08, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Given some of the cloak-n-daggerism surrounding this motion, “able to find it” will look a bit suspicious; there already seem to be enough dubious lumps under the rug as it is. Qwirkle (talk) 19:18, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwirkle: fixed in special:permalink/872233396

Thanks. Good to see it; with luck, it might not be needed later. Qwirkle (talk) 03:20, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cameron11598. You have new messages at Crazynas's talk page.
Message added 06:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Crazynas^t 06:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

favor please

Can you do me a favor and remove the IRC logs from the following posts:

The logs are in a pastebin.com link. I'd rather not do it myself. If you don't think you should, that's OK, but I would rather have them taken down. Thanks.

Seahawk01 (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

reason why: I don't want to point finger at other editors any more. Seahawk01 (talk) 02:32, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Seahawk01: Already done by Natureium --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 02:34, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, wait...he should of asked me first. I didn't think it was OK to edit users posts in Talk pages. Seahawk01 (talk) 02:36, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Seahawk01: Well your post had two issues which made it okay to redact the link; 1) you didn't have the consent of everyone involved to post the logs; 2)the post was technically a copyright violation as you didn't have a proper release for the statements made (this has been discussed by myself with an administrator in the past, tldr: Copyright law is confusing) --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 02:38, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018

Hello Cameron11598,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

Wikipedia talk:IRC

Do you really want me to spend all my time defending myself like this? Why don't we just seek a consensus over the next week. I personally think it would be much better. Thanks Seahawk01 (talk) 03:08, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What I'd like is for there to be a civil discussion making allegations like you have Seahawk01 is unacceptable. Please retract your statements or back them up in the form of diffs as required by policy. --Cameron11598(alt account) ^(Talk) 03:10, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but I feel just as attacked here. I can outline all the ways I feel attacked if you wish. Do you really want me to do that? Why not just have a civil discussion. Make a proposal in a new post on Wikipedia talk:IRC and let's leave the old thread behind. Seahawk01 (talk) 03:16, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Seahawk01: so you are refusing to redact your statements or provide diffs? Nothing in Jeske's statement was an attack. You however have accused him and others of bad faith without any evidence. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 03:19, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not refusing to provide justification for what I said. If you require justification I posted under your post on Wikipedia talk:IRC that it will take me time. I do not have a lot of time to spend on Wikipedia and next week is very busy, so what you are requesting will take some effort on my part. Seahawk01 (talk) 03:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Seahawk01:, you had time to make the accusations. What I'm requesting takes approximately 5 minutes to verify your claims. Every statement made has been on that page. I see nothing that justifies your claims. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 03:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cameron11598 I would like to ask you not to question me about my time. First of all, talking to you here is taking up a lot of time. Second, it is very taxing for me to deal with all of this to begin with. Third, I am only on another hour tonight and have things to do next week. In fact, I really shouldn't be spending my time on this right now. Seahawk01 (talk) 03:29, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]