User talk:Anakimi

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Women in Red World Contest Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! Acknowledgement Hi there, from Portugal, much appreciated (the kind attitude towards me), my approach is not always up to par as far as encyclopedical behaviour is concerned (i.e. edit summaries), but i'm only here to improve this wonderful concept. Happy new year/editing, until some other time and thanks again! --Quite A Character (talk) 19:59, 17 January 2019 (UTC) @Quite A Character: but your edit summaries (IMO, at least) are the best part! And a happy new year to you as well! — AnakimiHoller   21:10, 17 January 2019 (UTC) I see what you mean, vandalism is not to be taken lightly and the vast majority of these vandals are utter nuisances (others, just kids with a poorly-timed sense of humour), but i have written some stuff that's not cool (per site guidelines, that is). Anyways, take care :) --Quite A Character (talk) 21:26, 17 January 2019 (UTC) January 2019 I have removed your note from my talk page. I am unsure why you left it in the first place. If this has to do with the Nicolas Otamendi - honours section then you are mistaken in saying my conduct is detrimental or that I broke wikipedia guidelines. It actually is in line with Wikipedia guidelines as I sourced the honour and it is an official award bestowed by the Premier League. This is much like goal of the month, player of the month, manager of the month, etc that are all widely accepted by the Wikipedia guidelines as an official individual honor to be included on player pages.Rupert1904 (talk) 22:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC) Why are my edits disruptive and I am the only one being accused of vandalism? In my reversions, I always wrote out why I had included this honour in Otamendi's individual honours section. In fact, it was actually other editors who were using their opinions using phrases like "I don't think" or "probably not" when they reverted my edit. In fact, I feel that they were repeatedly disregarding and ignoring my edits and contribution just because they didn't agree with or don't like me. There were never any questions from others but just ridicule. But as instructed, I started a talk page to discuss the issue in a civilized, adult manner but, as of yet, people have refused to discuss on that forum and just continued to bully me instead. Editors these days are making editing on wikipedia a very challenging task and creating a harmful environment that is not in line with the spirit of which this site was intended. It is sad and unfortunate.Rupert1904 (talk) 23:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC) Thank you. The vandalism comment was less targeted at you and more so the circus-like reactions I am getting from other users. I am trying to keep my calm and excitement for editing but in this environment it can be difficult. I understand now that I violated the reversion rule and will not do it again but I did it in the spirit of having my voice heard and doing work by the proper wikipedia guidelines (or so I thought). I will use the talk page going forward to settle arguments/disagreements rather than the edit tool.Rupert1904 (talk) 23:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC) Bale Hey, all is good so far, hope the same for you. ;) No just saw you adding it back and never noticed it was gone. Nothing changed as we have evidence he got a medal. Kante4 (talk) 15:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC)