User talk:D.Belford

Welcome!

Hi, D.Belford. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Mr Ernie (talk) 12:27, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 01:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

D.Belford (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First I am requesting that Drmies or another admin copy and paste this request to the Enjois SPI investigation page since i am unable to edit apparently for 24 hours due to autoblock (for the record i just joined wikipedia and I am not a sockpuppet or a sock of enjois). I am requesting to be unblocked because the user who blocked me (Drmies) apparently is an activist ideologue masquerading as a neutral wikipedia admin/editor based on his remarks. He accused me of being "white and right-wing" without any evidence at all (i am actually biracial and consider myself a liberal centrist) and all of my edits were done by the book and NPOV. He also accused me of editing from a POV when all of my edits were reliably sourced (as you will see if you check) and were all done in a NPOV manner obeying the rules of wikipedia. D.Belford (talk) 04:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=First I am requesting that [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] or another admin copy and paste this request to the Enjois SPI investigation page since i am unable to edit apparently for 24 hours due to autoblock (for the record i just joined wikipedia and I am not a sockpuppet or a sock of enjois). I am requesting to be unblocked because the user who blocked me (Drmies) apparently is an activist ideologue masquerading as a neutral wikipedia admin/editor based on his remarks. He accused me of being "white and right-wing" without any evidence at all (i am actually biracial and consider myself a liberal centrist) and all of my edits were done by the book and NPOV. He also accused me of editing from a POV when all of my edits were reliably sourced (as you will see if you check) and were all done in a NPOV manner obeying the rules of wikipedia. [[User:D.Belford|D.Belford]] ([[User talk:D.Belford#top|talk]]) 04:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=First I am requesting that [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] or another admin copy and paste this request to the Enjois SPI investigation page since i am unable to edit apparently for 24 hours due to autoblock (for the record i just joined wikipedia and I am not a sockpuppet or a sock of enjois). I am requesting to be unblocked because the user who blocked me (Drmies) apparently is an activist ideologue masquerading as a neutral wikipedia admin/editor based on his remarks. He accused me of being "white and right-wing" without any evidence at all (i am actually biracial and consider myself a liberal centrist) and all of my edits were done by the book and NPOV. He also accused me of editing from a POV when all of my edits were reliably sourced (as you will see if you check) and were all done in a NPOV manner obeying the rules of wikipedia. [[User:D.Belford|D.Belford]] ([[User talk:D.Belford#top|talk]]) 04:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=First I am requesting that [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] or another admin copy and paste this request to the Enjois SPI investigation page since i am unable to edit apparently for 24 hours due to autoblock (for the record i just joined wikipedia and I am not a sockpuppet or a sock of enjois). I am requesting to be unblocked because the user who blocked me (Drmies) apparently is an activist ideologue masquerading as a neutral wikipedia admin/editor based on his remarks. He accused me of being "white and right-wing" without any evidence at all (i am actually biracial and consider myself a liberal centrist) and all of my edits were done by the book and NPOV. He also accused me of editing from a POV when all of my edits were reliably sourced (as you will see if you check) and were all done in a NPOV manner obeying the rules of wikipedia. [[User:D.Belford|D.Belford]] ([[User talk:D.Belford#top|talk]]) 04:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Belford, I wasn't talking about you--I was talking about your edits. That you cannot understand that NPOV and V are entirely different things is probably the reason your edits, under all those accounts, get reverted so often. POV content can easily be reliably sourced--that's not the point. Drmies (talk) 05:00, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

activist idealogue

And yet you use alt-right catch phrases. (On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog). BTW, you are not autoblocked for 24 hours. You are blocked directly per WP:checkuser evidence. (not to mention the behavioral evidence.) And certainly more check users will examine all of this thoroughly. Please read up on check users and please read the pertinent part of the GAB. Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, please point to where i used an "alt-right" catch phrase