User talk:Yolga

Hello, Yolga, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 18:43, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 23:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MrOllie: How could be an advertising? Most of the notes provided on this link are barely into fashion journalism and needs citation. I feel like the sites provided are more advertising. I personally watch fashion shows on fashion week online and I thought it's good to put them there. I've been looking for a reference and I saw the Huffpost one. So not sure why it could be an advertising when in fact they are the perfect example of fashion journalism. Thanks. Yolga (talk) 04:33, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Huffpost isn't a usable citation - for a period of time the Huffpost hosted self published blogs. The cite you're using is one of those. Fashion week online isn't a notable site and coverage of it on Fashion journalism would be undue weight. - MrOllie (talk) 11:49, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MrOllie: Weird, I can see many Huffpost citations and some blog source and not notable sources here on Wikipedia and some fake websites. Either you are discriminating other and only writes about your probably clients who paid for you. Discriminating other publications. Edit all Wikipedia sources not just the one I'm contributing. I can send you many of the fake celebrities I saw here if you like. Anyway, according to Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source meaning some paid editors like you maybe are very discriminatory. Bt the way, the resources you listed on your edits are not notable either and some needs citation. Those "notable" aren't really notable either. Yolga (talk 01:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]