Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Weitsman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by J947 (talk | contribs) at 03:37, 2 March 2019 (→‎Adam Weitsman: Closed as speedy keep (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) J947(c), at 03:37, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Weitsman[edit]

Adam Weitsman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local businessman. The references appear either trivial, or PR.. DGG ( talk ) 10:07, 6 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:19, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:19, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep All sources used are from reputable news outlets and do not include press releases or primary sources. Subject has been covered by both local and national news outlets (NYT, architectural digest, ESPN).Deadbolt44 (talk) 15:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:28, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:08, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Updated page to address and remove sources that appear PR, made minor restructuring edits and line edits.Deadbolt44 (talk) 22:12, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bearian,If you can add material about the importance of the collecting, and RSs to show that folk art historians consider that his work on stoneware is a major contribution, I'll withdraw the AfD DGG ( talk ) 01:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 04:38, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I won't have time until Saturday morning to work on this. Sorry! Bearian (talk) 00:36, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.