Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The League (web series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The League (web series)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NWEB / WP:FAILN. Not notable. Existing sources are dead, even some that are supposedly archived. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 06:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 02:42, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnotable web content. The sources, even before they became defunct, were not sufficient to pass the GNG. Three of them are very local news coverage only, and, from what I can tell from digging around, the mention in BusinessWeek was nothing more than an online poll, not an official "award" as the article tries to mischaracterize it as. And, searching for any other sources about the series besides these turns up nothing. 169.232.162.112 (talk) 17:14, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.