Talk:John Couey

Biography Redirect‑class

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This guy is only 47, but at first glance, you would think his age had switched digits.

Was Miss Lunsford murdered on March 18, 2005, or did Mr. Couey confess on March 18, 2005? The article (stub) is a bit unclear.

Jessica Lunsford was a victim. There needs to be more sensitivity within this article! She was tortured, and does not need to be tortured after death by being described in this manner. Human decency please.

This is an encyclopedia, not a sensitivity article. Perhaps on the jewish world war 2 pages we should tkae out about concentration campst too, after all they were tortured also correct? These are the facts, l;ike it or not, they are the facts. That's what Wiki is about.65.184.18.231 03:42, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whether it is an encyclopedia or not, it doesn't need to be deemed an "sesitivity article" just by showing some common decency. It is a terrible thing what this little girl and her family must have went through and I think that if people are starting to publish the ramblings of a crack smoking sex-offender as facts then you are just as bad as people who justify this man. What if that was your child up there and these so called facts are described in detail on the web for whoever to read? How would that make you feel? And, regarding the "facts" that wikipedia is about...how are knowing the gruesome details about what was supposedly said going to beneift anyone? Once again, it is another grotesque example of people using the media and other people's misery to gain popularity. You have officially been exposed to the underbelly of humankind. Whoever is writing these "insensitive" articles on wikipedia.

Officially? Hmm. Anyway, I was wondering if it was relevant whether or not the girl was a virgin prior to the crime, but sensitivity isn't really the issue. Also, I was puzzled that the article reads like she was abducted shortly after church, but then states it was about 3 AM. Does this sound hinky to anyone else? I think it'd be good for someone who knows what this is about to maybe clarify this. 24.131.12.228 05:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]