Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 15:35, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Atul Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolute fluff piece on a non-notable individual. Sources are largely primary and unreliable. Copious amounts of WP:ORIGINALSYN and WP:UNSOURCED material. Fails criteria listed in WP:BIO. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 11:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. But interesting side note - much of the article's content comes from a number of user accounts with a similar naming style who have only made edits to this article. I'm going to take a wild guess and say that this article was largely written by its subject. Cosmic Sans (talk) 14:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 20:44, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A cursory search for Atul Singh and Fair Observer (together) throws up no results other than his own and FO. All videos are either uploaded by him or FO. Only other link is an IIT ~~alumni~~ link but that is meaningless. Fails GNG. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. I thought it was an alumni link when I opened it; it was just a general bio. Nothing there to establish his notability there. He does have the blue tick on Twitter, but given the ease with which practically anyone can get a blue tick (and others don't including a Nobel laureate), I stand by my earlier !vote. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this promotional and possibly self-penned text trying to pass off as worthy of Wikipedia space, when no evidence supporting the subject's notability exists. -The Gnome (talk) 11:56, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.