User talk:Kku

This is Kku's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.


	This editor is a Looshpah Laureate of the Encyclopedia and is entitled to display this Book of All Knowledge with Secret Appendix, Errata Sheet, and Author's Signature.

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spring Web Flow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MVC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Can you help me create on article?

Hi KKu,

I noticed you create an article for Pimkie. I am an employee of NA-KD, a fashion company based in Sweden that has significant coverage in reliable sources, which I would be happy to share with you. We are based in Europe, so our press is in English, Swedish and German.

I was wondering if you could help us create an article for NA-KD? Here is the draft page, which is a few months old. I was going to start adding to it today, but wanted to get your input first.

thank you Evan (talk) 11:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for you message and your trust. Two things here: 1. I did not create "Pimkie" because somebody asked me to do it, but because I had evidence that we are dealing with a significant brand and a major economic power behind it. 2. If you provided a link to your draft page, I would be willing to review it and give hints, not more, no less. -- Kku (talk) 13:07, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you very much for offering to take a look. Here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:NA-KD Any help would be greatly appreciate. Thanks Evan (talk) 19:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, just a friendly followup to see if you might be able to assist us with this article. We would appreciate your expertise and guidance. Thank you very much Evan (talk) 12:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion is relevant to you

An editor posted this on my talk page, but since you expanded the redirect into a disambiguation page, you may also want to see it:

The article Violation of law has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable; not notable; no citations

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 15:41, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I had originally created the page as an article when I was new, but consensus turned it into a redirect. Later, you expanded it into a disambiguation, and I decided that it was more of a set index article than a disambiguation page, and declared it that. Then Roger 8 Roger proposed to delete it. So yeah. Just informing you. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 17:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. To purr is feline, to err is human. I wonder what happens to all valid concepts that are denied by people stuck to rules. -- Kku (talk) 22:40, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

East End Literature

Sorry to be "stalking" you Kku! but I was pleased to discover East End Literature, as I'm interested in British regional literature, and my mother was from the East End. I reverted your edit because the term urban exploration is used here in a difference sense than the linked term. This is another example other poor writing, unfortunately. Can you try copy editing this, if you are able? Rwood128 (talk) 18:30, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frequent pattern discovery has been accepted

Frequent pattern discovery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 20:44, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]