Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperlay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:47, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperlay

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability per WP:GNG. It won an award, but I'm not sure whether that is of any significance. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:56, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 15:40, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Complete lack of secondary sources about the app. Article seems to have been created for promotional purposes as well. Meszzy² (talk) 17:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is more about innovation than about promotion. It was my intention to balance that way. Like the articles about fx. Autocad or all the venues like fx. Mercedes-Benz Arena (Berlin). The project has got another innovation award/grant from an EU foundation, but there are no public references about that yet on their site. It was also my intention to also add some pages about the traditional calculations behind. But the amount of information about Entertainment rigging on Wikipedia is very sparse to non existing. The very basics kind of has to fixed first. So it turned out to be a bigger task, but still in progress. The structure of those few pages makes it very hard to just Extend. So I hope you don't just vote for deletion, but will get back with please try to fix that and that. User talk:Jkr drp —Preceding undated comment added 19:54, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked this user, who is the creator of the article, for likely covert advertising (UPE) and meatpuppetry. Delete, as a promotional article about unremarkable software. MER-C 19:47, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of notability. The references are published by the people behind the product or dependent secondary sources. Graywalls (talk) 15:42, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per policy. ——SerialNumber54129 15:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.