Jump to content

AN/SPY-6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PSR B1937+21 (talk | contribs) at 09:34, 10 May 2019 (→Versions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article is about Air and Missile Defense Radar. For Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges, see Dietary Reference Intake.
An Template:Sclass-

The AMDR (Air and Missile Defense Radar, now officially named AN/SPY-6)[1] is an active electronically scanned array[2] air and missile defense 3D radar under development for the United States Navy.[3] It will provide integrated air and missile defense, and even periscope detection, for the Flight III Template:Sclass-s.[4]

Development

On October 10, 2013, "Raytheon Company (RTN) [was] awarded a $385,742,176 cost-plus-incentive-fee contract for the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase design, development, integration, test and delivery of Air and Missile Defense S-band Radar (AMDR-S) and Radar Suite Controller (RSC)." [5] In September 2010, the Navy awarded technology development contracts to Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon to develop the S-band radar and radar suite controller (RSC). X-band radar development reportedly will come under separate contracts. The Navy hopes to place AMDR on Flight III Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, possibly beginning in 2016. Those ships currently mount the Aegis Combat System, produced by Lockheed Martin.[6]

In 2013, the Navy cut almost $10 billion from the cost of the program by adopting a smaller less capable system that will be challenged by "future threats".[7] As of 2013 the program is expected to deliver 22 radars at a total cost of $6,598m; they will cost $300m/unit in serial production.[8] Testing is planned for 2021 and Initial operating capability is planned for March 2023.[8] The Navy then was forced to halt the contract in response to a challenge by Lockheed.[9] Lockheed officially withdrew their protest on January 10, 2014[10], allowing the Navy to lift the stop work order.[11]

Technology

The AMDR system consists of two primary radars and a radar suite controller (RSC) to coordinate the sensors. An S-band radar is to provide volume search, tracking, ballistic missile defense discrimination and missile communications while the X-band radar is to provide horizon search, precision tracking, missile communication and terminal illumination of targets.[6] The S-band and X-band sensors will also share functionality including radar navigation, periscope detection, as well as missile guidance and communication. AMDR is intended as a scalable system; the Burke deckhouse can only accommodate a 4.3 m (14 ft) version but the USN claim they need a radar of 6.1 m (20 ft) or more to meet future ballistic missile threats.[8] This would require a new ship design; Ingalls have proposed the Template:Sclass- as the basis for a ballistic missile defense cruiser with 6.1 m (20 ft) AMDR. To cut costs the first twelve AMDR sets will have an X-band component based on the existing SPQ-9B rotating radar, to be replaced by a new X-band radar in set 13 that will be more capable against future threats.[8] The transmit-receive modules will use new gallium nitride semiconductor technology.[8] This will allow for higher power density than the previous gallium arsenide radar modules.[12] The new radar will require twice the electrical power as the previous generation while generating over 35 times as much radar power.[13]

Although it was not an initial requirement, the AMDR may be capable of performing electronic attacks using its AESA antenna. Airborne AESA radar systems, like the APG-77 used on the F-22 Raptor, and the APG-81 and APG-79 used on the F-35 Lightning II, and F/A-18 Super Hornet/EA-18G Growler respectively, and have demonstrated their capability to conduct electronic attack. The contenders for the Navy's Next Generation Jammer all used Gallium Nitride-based (GaN) transmit-receiver modules for their EW systems, which enables the possibility that the high-power GaN-based AESA radar used on Flight III ships can perform the mission. Precise beam steering could attack air and surface threats with tightly directed beams of high-powered radio waves to electronically blind aircraft, ships, and missiles.[14]

The radar is 30 times more sensitive and can simultaneously handle over 30 times the targets of the existing AN/SPY-1D(V) in order to counter large and complex raids.[15]

Versions

  • AN/SPY-6(V)1: AMDR with 37 RMAs for Flight III Arleigh Burke-class DDG.
  • AN/SPY-6(V)2: Otherwise known as the Enterprise Air Surveillance Radar[16]. Rotated and scaled-down version with 9 RMAs for Flight II San Antonio-class LPD.
  • AN/SPY-6(V)3: Fixed version EASR for Ford-class aircraft carrier and FFG(X).
  • AN/SPY-6(V)4: AMDR with 24 RMAs to be retrofitted to Flight IIA Arleigh Burke-class DDG.

See also

References

  1. ^ http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/amdr/
  2. ^ http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_display.asp?cid=2100&tid=306&ct=2
  3. ^ "AMDR Competition: The USA's Next Dual-Band Radar". Archived from the original on 13 October 2010. Retrieved 2010-10-01. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ "Exhibit R-2A, RDT&E Project Justification: PB 2011 Navy" (PDF). 2010-03-15. Retrieved 2010-10-01.
  5. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2013-10-18. Retrieved 2013-10-10. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  6. ^ a b "New Radar Development Continues for U.S. Navy". Defense News. Archived from the original on 2012-09-20. Retrieved 2011-04-01. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  7. ^ "NavWeek: Radar Shove."
  8. ^ a b c d e "GAO-13-294SP DEFENSE ACQUISITIONS Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs" (PDF). US Government Accountability Office. March 2013. pp. 117–8. Retrieved 26 May 2013.
  9. ^ Shalal-Esa, Andrea (23 October 2013). "U.S. Navy orders Raytheon to halt radar work after protest". www.reuters.com. Reuters. Retrieved 23 October 2013.
  10. ^ McCarthy, Mike (10 January 2014). "Lockheed Martin Drops Protest On Award Of Navy's New Shipboard Radar". Defense Daily. Defense Daily Network. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
  11. ^ LaGrone, Sam (13 January 2014). "Lockheed Martin Drops Protest over Next Generation Destroyer Radar". news.usni.org. US Naval Institute News. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
  12. ^ "The Heart of the Navy’s Next Destroyer."
  13. ^ Filipoff, Dmitry (4 May 2016). "CIMSEC Interviews Captain Mark Vandroff, Program Manager DDG-51, Part 1". cimsec.org. CIMSEC. Retrieved 5 May 2016.
  14. ^ Navy’s Next Generation Radar Could Have Future Electronic Attack Abilities - News.USNI.org, 17 January 2014
  15. ^ http://defense-update.com/20150512_amdr_cdr.html
  16. ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FADAPPKXk40
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AN/SPY-6&oldid=896412707"