Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Access Point

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:07, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Global Access Point

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's a brief company history and list of locations. Nothing about the company seems especially notable, and I couldn't find any additional coverage that would indicate notability. creffett (talk) 18:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 18:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 18:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 18:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - coverage is either in non-independent sources or doesn't satisfy Sig Cov. As well as the name being used as a phrase in different ways, the photo also gets used so watch in your BEFORE checks. There are some proper articles about (usually outgoing) company officers, but not enough side coverage of company. Their parent company doesn't have an article, so no obvious redirect. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete - I listed it for speedy, obviously I agree with nomination now. Good BEFORE analysis by Nosebagbear too. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:23, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication of notability, completely promo article with not enough RS coverage. $ɱ$ (talk) 16:37, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no RS coverage, fails WP:NCORP. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.