Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Brigden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Brigden[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It more looks likes a detailed version of a Linkedin profile, I cant see any signs of notability. Wikipedia is not an advertising platform of companies for their Business executives. Not independently notable outside of his role at company, No indepth news coverage, lacks WP:RS, fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya (talk) 17:52, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:56, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A non-notable businessman. This is Wikipedia not linkedin.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:44, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Being the CCO, board secretary, etc., by itself is not notable. He has to have done something. Bearian (talk) 17:28, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Non-notable businessman. Barca (talk) 23:26, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: person had notable positions. Cisco is major company and his position is SVP. However, I find mostly passing mentions of the person. Wm335td (talk) 18:47, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.