Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bebilith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:11, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bebilith[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Badly sourced stub about little-known Dungeons & Dragons monster. No indication of real-world notability. Not a very active user (talk) 04:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 04:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 04:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 04:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:37, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fail the WP:GNG. TTN (talk) 11:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not nearly enough real world notability. If there is an appropriate list article, then a redirect would be appropriate.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:40, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.