Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1906 Wisła Kraków season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 23:10, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1906 Wisła Kraków season[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possibly fails WP:GNG as the Poland professional league wasn't really a thing until 1927 at the earliest with some of the earlier seasons being just friendlies. I would also like to nominate these pages for the same reason.

1907 Wisła Kraków season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1908 Wisła Kraków season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1909 Wisła Kraków season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1910 Wisła Kraków season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) HawkAussie (talk) 02:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 02:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 02:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Professionalism really doesn't have anything to do with season articles - it's all about WP:GNG, so I'm a lean delete without prejudice of recreation if better sources are available. SportingFlyer T·C 03:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Probably does fail GNG but I would remove them in any case because they are bare statistics only and so fail that part of WP:IINFO. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of notability per NSEASONS/GNG. Giant Snowman 11:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Sadly no improvement in the five years since they were created, fail WP:GNG, WP:NSEASONS. Govvy (talk) 12:06, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.