Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Newnam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:50, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

William Newnam[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG and doesn't appear to meet any of the criteria for inclusion in the academic/professor guidelines. There are no articles about William Newman, outside of a few 'Emory News' briefings, which probably isn't a reliable secondary source considering he works at the institution. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no independent sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Both of the books listed in the article appear to be co-authored. XOR'easter (talk) 17:06, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I didn't find reviews of the books (so no evidence of passing WP:AUTHOR) and the "Ovid L. Davis Award" seems so non-notable that of the six Google hits for this phrase, half go back to this article. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. I searched under the name Bill and found very little to nothing, basically insignificant coverage. Bearian (talk) 15:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.