Talk:Hong Kong Free Press
A fact from Hong Kong Free Press appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 July 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hong Kong Free Press. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150720235434/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=4&art_id=151372&sid=43354957&con_type=1&d_str=20141113&fc=7 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=4&art_id=151372&sid=43354957&con_type=1&d_str=20141113&fc=7
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
"Mod 83" edits
Hello. I suspect that User:Mod 83 is related to other users who have been making similar edits on this page for some time.
I am reverting the most recent edits for a couple reasons. For one, online forum discussions do not constitute reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Secondly, much of the content seems to be WP:OR that is not reflected in the cited sources. Citobun (talk) 06:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- I want to make it clear that the user "mod 83" is not me, "mod83" - I am the HKFP founder and have never edited this Wiki entry. mod83 (talk) 00:15, 08 May 2019
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hong Kong Free Press. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150206124504/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=10130&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=20010228&sear_year=2001 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=&art_id=10130&sid=&con_type=1&d_str=20010228&sear_year=2001
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Irrelevant mentions of SCMP in "Background" section
The mentions about press freedom and SCMP are irrelevant (or the relevance is unclear). It seems like promotional copy to link HKFP as equivalent to SCMP, and ties to press freedom are unclear or involves a few leaps of imagination to make the links. Recommend removing.
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class Journalism articles
- Unknown-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- Start-Class Freedom of speech articles
- Unknown-importance Freedom of speech articles
- Start-Class Hong Kong articles
- Mid-importance Hong Kong articles
- WikiProject Hong Kong articles
- Wikipedia articles that use Hong Kong English