Jump to content

User talk:BillHPike

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Datamaster1 (talk | contribs) at 17:48, 23 February 2020 (SP Accusation: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

Books & Bytes – Issue 37

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 37, November – December 2019

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
  • The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input. No proposed process received consensus.

Technical news

  • Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
  • When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [1]

Arbitration

  • Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.

Miscellaneous



New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello BillHPike,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources
Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Another one

George Walton Academy seems like another article that might interest you, when you have time.Jacona (talk) 22:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As a promotional brochure, it interests me, Jacona. Wondering if you (Bill) want me to hold off on de-adveretising it till you look it over? John from Idegon (talk) 23:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I added some cited facts. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 02:56, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, BillHPike. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

SP Accusation

I am not a sock. Feel free to have my account run through CU process. But please don't make accusations without evidence. I have made many edits including the ones you have listed. Mr. Awesome, PhD (talk) 17:48, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]