Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulsa Fire Department

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cerebral726 (talk | contribs) at 13:59, 9 March 2020 (Closing AfD, result was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn).). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Cerebral726 (talk) 13:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tulsa Fire Department (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has excessive detail about a volunteer fire department that does not seem to have any WP:SIGCOV. The only sources are primary sources from the Tulsa government or the fire department itself. Cerebral726 (talk) 13:24, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cerebral726 (talk) 13:24, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Cerebral726 (talk) 13:24, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. A department with a budget of $70.3 Million for a city of 400,000 people is not "volunteer", so I do not believe a proper WP:BEFORE has been done. -- Tavix (talk) 13:40, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's fair that I made a mistake in calling it a volunteer fire department, but that was more of mental lapse than not actually looking into the organization. Having checked the sources in the article, they do not show any significant coverage, and searching elsewhere, all the coverage appeared just to be routine coverage of fires in and around Tulsa. Cerebral726 (talk) 13:52, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.