Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fariba Rahimi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fariba Rahimi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't see a credible claim of notability here, and am not convinced that the sources cut the mustard. TheLongTone (talk) 15:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:57, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:57, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:57, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:00, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:00, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:01, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable model. Considering she was born around the time Iran became an Islamic Republic, some of the language on how this effected her life course needs to be reconsidered in the unlikely event we keep this article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:11, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see no coverage of her. The author picked me out (I don't know why) to ask me for a review for notability, with special mention of the additional footnotes they'd added. My review wasn't favorable, and I haven't found any addition sources elsewhere to make a case for meeting WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Largoplazo (talk) 02:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.