Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Iversen

Kim Iversen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Kim Iversen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional tone, low notability, reliant on self-published material. Brownsc (talk) 15:31, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:47, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:47, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:47, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:47, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:50, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

• Delete a non-notable journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:29, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
• Delete promotional and non-notable DGG ( talk ) 11:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
• Keep - This article is 14 years old. It seems a bit redundant to delete it now. The article has existed for years. I think it's notable enough as it is documenting a public figure. (MoonlightTulsi) (talk) 23:13, 13 March 2020
• Keep: Per MoonlightTulsi. Self-published & a few primary sources should be removed. Her YouTube account is an external source. Othen than that, the article is good enough to pass Wikipedia:NJOURNALIST. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:45, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
• Keep - I'd heard Kim Iversen's name mentioned a few times in passing by other journalists and political commentators and one of her videos just popped up for me in a YouTube "Recommended" list. I appreciated being able to learn at least something about her at Wikipedia. I don't see a compelling reason to delete this article. PCMartinSeattle (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2020 (UTC)