Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zephyr (musical project)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zephyr (musical project)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Page was started in 2008 by user:Zephyrlife7, so a COI issue, who has made no other contributions to Wikipedia. The image used is apparently made by her, and is used in one of the sources given. Article has not been substantially updated since 2008. Sources are either dead links or trivial. Emeraude (talk) 13:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 13:41, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 13:41, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability, can't find significant coverage. Polyamorph (talk) 14:42, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, unable to find significant RS. Caro7200 (talk) 15:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable. Little coverage. Doesn't appear to have charted (at least not significantly). Foxnpichu (talk) 17:43, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - When searching, beware of the notable Zephyr (band) featuring Tommy Bolin. As for this project, I can find one minor review: [1], and that was probably solicited by the group. I can find nothing else on this act beyond their own self-promotional efforts. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doomsdayer520 - Oh man. I never thought about that. I still think the page should be deleted regardless. Foxnpichu (talk) 20:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.