Jump to content

User talk:KartikeyaS343

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RoZTaly (talk | contribs) at 08:02, 24 March 2020 (→‎Mistake: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

There seems to be a disagreement on whether the Khatabook article is ready for mainspace. You have suggested this might be a case of WP:UPE. In your opinion, what should happen now? Should User:Prakashchinna be warned for edit warring? I was certainly surprised when he reported you at WP:AIV. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear fellow Wikipedians, I reported about Mr.Karthikeya, after looking at his log, as i found most of his edits were not about article creations,but of articles removal. So, I assumed he may be a vandalism attacker. This is the reason why brought the account to the administrators notice. Educate me if my assumptions were wrong. I was bit confused when User:EdJohnston was asking an advice from the user, on taking an action!!. I hope you guys knew each other? -- Prakashchinna (talk) 04:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Prakashchinna, my analysis suggests that you are the one in the wrong. You have twice moved Draft:Khatabook to main space as Khatabook without waiting for the normal result of the WP:AFC process. In fact, you removed the AfC template from the article. To avoid sanctions, I suggest you agree that the page be made a draft once again and you promise to wait for the decision of the AfC reviewers. Your use of the term 'vandalism' in your edit summaries is incorrect and may be blockable if it continues. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EdJohnston, if you feel the same. No issues, I will not further edit or interfere at that particular page which you mentioned. I will work on other pages. Thank you - Prakashchinna (talk) 04:44, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • EdJohnston, thank you for the note. I did it based on the listing at Wikiproject SPAM by MER-C. Based on their edit pattern, it does give me paid-editing vibes too so in my opinion, it would have been best to get the articles listed at AFC for a review however you are much senior editor and an administrator so I would prefer your decision as the best option in this case. Thanks, KartikeyaS (talk) 05:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet of Riedits. MER-C 10:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, User:MER-C and User:KartikeyaS343. It appears that the anti-spam system is working as intended. Particularly surprising that Prakashchinna accepted the draft submitted by Riedits. That's about as daring as reporting a patroller at AIV for doing what they are supposed to do. EdJohnston (talk) 13:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to both of you for resolving the matter :) KartikeyaS (talk) 06:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kabir Helminski

Thanks for your comment on my article under review: Kabir Helminski. In light of it, I have now removed any statements that are not verified by an independent reliable source, with the following exceptions: statements which simply list Helminski's books (I assume I don't have to provide a footnote linking to the publisher's page for each book); brief quotations from his books (again, I assume I do not have to provide a footnote linking to the book itself on the publisher's website). It would be much appreciated if you could let me know if this article now meets requirements in your opinion. Danthedervish (talk) 16:13, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your article has already been submitted so please wait for a reviewer to review it. Best, KartikeyaS (talk) 06:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake

Hello KartikeyaS343 as you know i love to write I write people biography, actor biography notable person, etc. I search online about celebrities, notable persons, films, etc. Then I write. If i did some mistake so please help me and solve it.

Thanks