Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cam Folker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cam Folker

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and no sources other than the one in the article can be found. PotentPotables (talk) 02:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one local newspaper article is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The content is unclear and has not been written in a clear tone. The content completely relies upon a single source and lack reliable sources. Abishe (talk) 15:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the tone and formatting of the article are way off. Only one source and its a local interest story. Fails WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT, WP:GNG. I can't even. Bearian (talk) 01:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.