Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Afrodisiac

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk | contribs) at 09:04, 26 April 2020 (→‎Natural Afrodisiac: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:04, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Natural Afrodisiac[edit]

Natural Afrodisiac (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Band fails WP:BAND. All mentions are local and trivial. The group has disbanded so no hope of meeting notability in the future. Mbdfar (talk) 05:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The significant local coverage is almost enough, combined with Billboard, etc., but not quite. Not really covered by national music press.
  • Delete i previously put this up for PROD. Mccapra (talk) 04:32, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.