Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Guerin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 15:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Guerin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actor. Stub has been poorly sourced, with only IMDb as external link, since 2013. Deprodded with no additional sources added, with editor asserting notability with no evidence to back up claims. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment interview in Blockade (GB) December 1993, Vol. 1, Iss. 7, pg. 3-4. Some years after her last credit. May explain what happened to her career, whether her name was changed, etc. I do not know and have not found the magazine. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 12:04, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete IMDb alone is not enough to show notability. Interviews are not counted as a sign of notability for GNG reasons, and one source is not enough to pass the GNG either. The fact that an article like this has existed for 14 years is not encouraging.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I would certainly like to see the Blockade article, if anyone can locate it online. Dflaw4 (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.