Talk:Agricultural technology
![]() | Agriculture Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Telecommunications Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
Requested move 2 May 2020
![]() | The request to rename this article to Agricultural technology has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
Agritech → Agricultural technology – This is the full name, "agritech" just being a jargon abbreviation. This page does not get many page views, which is remarkable considering it is linked in the heading of the {{agriculture}} template. The similar articles Agricultural engineering and Agricultural machinery (which are not linked in the template heading) both get substantially more page views. This is all to suggest that "agritech" is not a search term many are likely to use. I have just retargeted "agricultural technology" to this article, where it previously redirected to "agricultural machinery". But it would be preferable to use this as the name of the article. — the Man in Question (in question) 21:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support per jargon argument. No point obfuscating titles like this. Axem Titanium (talk) 17:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support to draw a clearer connection between this article and others in the same category. Alexius08 (talk) 04:29, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Not sure what the confusion about renaming this is. If you're going to rename this, then perhaps you should also consider renaming the following: Agritech (Agriculture + Technology) Edutech (Education + Technology) Fintech (Financial + Technology) Foodtech (Food + Technology) Healthtech (Health + Technology) Sportstech (Sports + Technology)
Oh, and don't forget to rename Agritech Tokyo Expo as well: https://www.agriexpo-tokyo.jp/en-gb/about/agritech.html Oh, and don't forget to rename Agriweek Tokyo too: https://www.agriexpo-tokyo.jp/en-gb.html Face it... it would be easier and better to cross-link the two rather than renaming one or the other!