Jump to content

User talk:MrOllie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Colonel James Walker (talk | contribs) at 18:41, 13 May 2020 (Reverted edits: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Sonargraph

Hi Mr. Ollie,

I notice that you removed our tool Sonargraph from the list of static analysis tools in Sept 2019 while a bunch of our competing commercial tools are still there. We have many users and customers worldwide and also provide a free version called Sonargraph-Explorer. Universities and scientists are using our tools too. How can I get our tool back on the page? For some reason the predecessor of Sonargraph named Sotoarc is still there. Sonargraph is much more relevant because it is the successor of Sotoarc. More info about our tools is on <<link redacted>>. A more recent scientific paper also mentions our tool: An ontology-based approach for documenting and validating architecture rules — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azitzewitz (talkcontribs) 21:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is a list of tools that have a preexisting Wikipedia article. I'll also note that you refer to it as 'our tool' - you may be in violation of Wikipedia's terms of use with regard to paid editing and/or conflict of interest. You can find more details at WP:COI and WP:PAID. - MrOllie (talk) 21:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We used to have an article about Sonargraph, that was also deleted. I just wonder how all these other tools pass the hurdle. They are often also entered by the very people that created them. So my question is about fairness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azitzewitz (talkcontribs) 22:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Without looking at specifics, either they have the required sourcing, or it is just that no one has noticed and nominated them for deletion yet. But eventually it'll happen. - MrOllie (talk) 22:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I mentioned us being sourced in scientific papers (one ref was given as an example). And who would mark us for deletion? A competitor? How do you maintain a complete list of static analyzers if some are deleted and some are not? Now the list does not represent a good answer for people who want to know what tools are available. Sonargraph is on the market for almost 15 years now with many happy users. I added the text about Sonargraph and kept it completely neutral, no marketing or advertising language. What I am learning now is that you cannot use Wikipedia as an entry point for tool research. What would happen if one of our users created an entry? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azitzewitz (talkcontribs) 13:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RedWarn

Greetings! I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta test my new tool, RedWarn, specifically designed for the fastest vandalism reverts in the west (yee-haw!). If you're interested, please see see the RedWarn page for installation instructions. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your page. Your feedback is much appreciated! JamesHSmith6789 (talk) 22:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why you have redirected Ulugbekhon Maksumov to INKAS ? Ninjaediator (talk) 21:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected Changes on Cloud Storage

Cloud Storage

Hi Mr.Ollie, I see my edit rejected on Cloud Storage for Paid Advocacy. I want to specify that I'm not getting any direct or indirect compensation for editing that thread. My only purpose was to add Cubbit in that thread in order to create our Wikipedia page (that will be online soon). I hope this can solve this and my edits can be reviewed again and accepted. Marcorutini (talk) 10:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edits

Excuse me, why did you revert the edit on Press to Play?