Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insigniam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Insigniam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP as none of the sources are significant, independent and reliable. The vast majority are merely passing references (many do not even mention the name Insigniam at all). What appears to be a source that has significant coverage [1] is Sponsored Content/Branded content as evidenced by an Insigniam advertisement on the first content page, and the editor's welcome on the second page "Welcome to Leadership Principles: A Development Resource, a special edition of the HBAdvantage, the magazine of the HBA. The HBA, in conjunction with Insigniam and our other corporate sponsors and volunteers, is pleased to offer this publication with inspiring and practical leadership information to further your advancement in healthcare." This explicitly identified Insigniam as a corporate sponsor of the 15 page "special edition" of this industry magazine, which explains why half of the pages feature glowing promotional language about the company. Theredproject (talk) 13:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.