Mise en abyme
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/31/Las_Meninas%2C_by_Diego_Vel%C3%A1zquez%2C_from_Prado_in_Google_Earth.jpg/220px-Las_Meninas%2C_by_Diego_Vel%C3%A1zquez%2C_from_Prado_in_Google_Earth.jpg)
In Western art history, Mise en abyme (French pronunciation: [miz ɑ̃n‿abim]; also mise en abîme) is a formal technique of placing a copy of an image within itself, often in a way that suggests an infinitely recurring sequence. In film theory and literary theory, it refers to the technique of inserting a story within a story. The term is derived from heraldry and literally means "placed into abyss". It was first appropriated for modern criticism by the French author André Gide.
A common sense of the phrase is the visual experience of standing between two mirrors, seeing as a result an infinite reproduction of one's image.[1] Another is the Droste effect, in which a picture appears within itself, in a place where a similar picture would realistically be expected to appear.[2] That is named after the 1904 Droste cocoa package, which depicts a woman holding a tray bearing a Droste cocoa package, which bears a smaller version of her image.[3]
Heraldry
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cd/Royal_Arms_of_United_Kingdom_%281816-1837%29.svg/220px-Royal_Arms_of_United_Kingdom_%281816-1837%29.svg.png)
In the terminology of heraldry, the abyme is the center of a coat of arms. The term mise en abyme (also called inescutcheon) then meant put in the center. It described a coat of arms that appears as a smaller shield in the center of a larger one (see Droste effect).
A complex example of mise en abyme is seen in the coat of arms of the United Kingdom for the period 1816–1837, as used by King George III. The crown of Charlemagne is placed en abyme within the escutcheon of Hanover, which in turn is en abyme within the arms of England, Scotland, and Ireland.
Another example is the two-headed eagle in the modern coat of arms of Russia, which holds a sceptre topped by a similar eagle holding a similar sceptre.
Medieval examples
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/06/Istanbul.Hagia_Sophia075.jpg/300px-Istanbul.Hagia_Sophia075.jpg)
While art historians working on the early-modern period adopted this phrase and interpreted it as showing artistic "self awareness", medievalists tended not to use it.[citation needed] Many examples, however, can be found in the pre-modern era, as in a mosaic from the Hagia Sophia dated to the year 944. To the left, Justinian I offers the Virgin Mary the Hagia Sophia, which contains the mosaic itself. To the right, Constantine I offers the city of Constantinople (now known as Istanbul), which itself contains the Hagia Sophia.
More medieval examples can be found in the collection of articles Medieval mise-en-abyme: the object depicted within itself,[4] in which Stuart Whatling conjectures that the self-references sometimes are used to strengthen the symbolism of gift-giving by documenting the act of giving on the object itself. An example of this self-referential gift-giving appears in the Stefaneschi Triptych in the Vatican Museum, which features Cardinal Giacomo Gaetani Stefaneschi as the giver of the altarpiece.[5]
Critical theory and art history
In Western art history, mise en abyme is a formal technique in which an image contains a smaller copy of itself, in a sequence appearing to recur infinitely; "recursive" is another term for this. The modern meaning of the phrase originates with the author André Gide who used it to describe self-reflexive embeddings in various art forms and to describe what he sought in his own work.[4] As examples, Gide cites both paintings such as Las Meninas by Diego Velázquez and literary forms such as William Shakespeare's use of the "play within a play" device in Hamlet, where a theatrical company presents a performance for the characters that illuminates a thematic aspect of the play itself. This use of the phrase mise en abyme was picked up by scholars and popularized in the 1977 book Le récit spéculaire. Essai sur la mise en abyme by Lucien Dällenbach.[6]
Literature and film
Mise en abyme occurs in a text when there is a reduplication of images or concepts referring to the textual whole. Mise en abyme is a play of signifiers within a text, of sub-texts mirroring each other. [7] This mirroring can attain a level where meaning may become unstable and, in this respect, may be seen as part of the process of deconstruction. The film-within-a-film, where a film contains a plot about the making of a movie, is an example of mise en abyme. The film being made within the film refers, through its mise en scène, to the real film being made. The spectator sees film equipment, stars getting ready for the take, crew sorting out the various directorial needs. The narrative of the film within the film may directly reflect the one in the real film.[8] An example is La Nuit américaine (1973) by François Truffaut.
In film, the meaning of mise en abyme is similar to the artistic definition, but also includes the idea of a "dream within a dream". For example, a character awakens from a dream and later discovers that s/he is still dreaming. Activities similar to dreaming, such as unconsciousness and virtual reality, also are described as mise en abyme. This is seen in the film eXistenZ where the two protagonists never truly know whether or not they are out of the game. It also becomes a prominent element of Charlie Kaufman's Synecdoche, New York (2008). A more recent instance can be found in the film Inception (2010). Classic filmic examples include the snow globe in Citizen Kane (1941) which provides a clue to the film's core mystery, and the discussion of Edgar Allan Poe's written works (particularly "The Purloined Letter") in the Jean-Luc Godard film Band of Outsiders (1964).
In literary criticism, mise en abyme is a type of frame story, in which the core narrative may be used to illuminate some aspect of the framing story. The term is used in deconstruction and deconstructive literary criticism as a paradigm of the intertextual nature of language, that is, of the way language never quite reaches the foundation of reality because it refers in a frame-within-a-frame way, to other language, which refers to other language, and so forth.[9][page needed]
See also
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/99/Wiktionary-logo-en-v2.svg/40px-Wiktionary-logo-en-v2.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/4a/Commons-logo.svg/30px-Commons-logo.svg.png)
- Droste effect – Recursive visual effect
- Fractal – Infinitely detailed mathematical structure
- Matryoshka doll – Russian nested wooden toy created in 1890
- Gödel, Escher, Bach (1979 book) – 1979 book by Douglas Hofstadter
- Macbeth (1971 film) – 1971 film by Roman Polanski
- Meta-reference – Type of self reference
- Mise en abyme – A formal technique of placing a copy of an image within itself
- Print Gallery (M. C. Escher) – Lithograph printed in 1956 by the Dutch artist M. C. Escher
- Quine (computing) – Self-replicating program
- Recursion – Process of repeating items in a self-similar way
- Self-similarity – Whole of an object being mathematically similar to part of itself
- Story within a story – Literary device
References
- ^ Rheinhardt, Dagmar (2012). Youtopia. a Passion for the Dark: Architecture at the Intersection Between Digital Processes and Theatrical Performance. Freerange Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-9808689-1-3.
- ^ Nänny. Max and Fischer, Olga, The Motivated Sign: Iconicity in Language and Literature p. 37, John Benjamins Publishing Company (2001) ISBN 90-272-2574-5
- ^ Törnqvist, Egil. Ibsen: A Doll's House, p. 105, Cambridge University Press (1995) ISBN 0-521-47866-9
- ^ a b Medieval mise-en-abyme: the object depicted within itself (collection of papers) Archived 2013-11-02 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Giotto di Bondone and assistants: Stefaneschi triptych
- ^ Lucien Dällenbach, Le récit spéculaire. Essai sur la mise en abyme, Paris, Seuil, 1977
- ^ Hayward, Susan. "Mise-en-abime" in Cinema Studies: The Key Concepts (Third Edition). Routledge, 2006. p. 252-253
- ^ Susan. Cinema Studies Key Concepts. New York: Routledge, 2006. Accessed 2009-05-27
- ^ Ross Chambers (1984). Story and Situation: Narrative Seduction and the Power of Fiction.