Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Gouten
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:35, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Alexis Gouten[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Alexis Gouten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability since this article contains no reliable sources. Sources only trivially mention the subject of the article. Article is written poorly. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as promotion. Trillfendi (talk) 21:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
I don't understand your comment reagrding the source quality. Which critiera do you base on to mention source are not reliable ? Most sources are coming from the main media specialize in the watchmaking field. Your answer will be highly appreciate in order to better source it if necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yves Damien (talk • contribs)
- @Yves Damien: Exactly my point, because there are only industry sources, there is no indication of notablity because industry sources are primary sources. Therefore, because this article contains none to few secondary sources (which are reliable and that don't just give a trivial mention) its notablity is not demonstrated. See WP:GNG.
- If you are interested to see just why the sources in this article are so bad, I would like to invite you to my sandbox (here). P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 21:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Setting aside possible notability, this is a piece of crap. Much of his claims are based on who his parents were and starting a small company. I don't buy it. Bearian (talk) 02:08, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.