Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conflict of Heroes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 12:51, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Heroes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It exists, but doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 08:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 16:34, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1], [2] and [3] all appear to be reliable sources, though most are quite small press. The Finnish one's author probably is enough of an expert in the field to meet WP:SPS even if it is almost a one-man blog. keep . In general, when nominating board games, is a good idea to look at the BGG page for external web links when doing the WP:BEFORE thing. Many of those are reviews. Hobit (talk) 17:19, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm not sure I really agree on that third source being automatically counted as an established expert so that his blog can be considered a valid WP:SPS, but the other two sources brought up by Hobit above seem solid enough. Note that there was also a video game adaptation of this board game a while back, as well, so there may be some additional sources floating around regarding that, though I was unable to find anything at the time of this writing. Rorshacma (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Leaning keep but please fix the article with the sources first.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tone 17:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.