Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common Sense Party (UK) (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Sandstein (talk | contribs) at 08:08, 23 July 2020 (→‎Common Sense Party (UK): Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Common Sense Party (UK)[edit]

Common Sense Party (UK) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a Gazetteer of political parties. This article fails GNG and ORG and whilst there are citations, they only prove existence rather than achievement. There is no notability prior to, or following, elections and no notable election result. Usefulness is not a valid reason to retain an article. doktorb wordsdeeds 22:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. doktorb wordsdeeds 22:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. doktorb wordsdeeds 22:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. doktorb wordsdeeds 22:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. In the previous AfD debate, the rationale for keeping the page was that the party was extant. As this is no longer the case, and per the nominator's comments, there seems no reason to keep the page. It's a near-orphan and it doesn't appear to be connected with anyone significant, so there's no obvious target for a redirect. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 09:51, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.