Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirty Monster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dirty Monster

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can find no significant and reliable coverage for this band, such as album reviews or feature articles. Note that this WP entry is entirely dependent on citations to the now-defunct CDBaby site. All that can be found are the typical streaming, retail, and lyrics sites, and the occasional unreliable blog (e.g. [1]). They got songs onto a couple of TV shows but those strokes of good luck were not covered in the reliable media either. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 03:28, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 03:28, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the inclusion of their song in an episode of TV show falls short of WP:BAND criterion 10, and I don't see any other evidence of notability. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 09:36, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, no real RS, most mentions were about their song appearing in a TV episode. Caro7200 (talk) 13:05, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I said this before and I say it now: If a Google search for a band only results in unreliable sites like databases, social media pages, their official site/the site of their record label, streaming service entries, blogs, Youtube videos, concert sites, lyrics sites, retail sites, download sites and trivial mentions/name checks, then that band does not deserve a Wikipedia article. These are not reliable sources. At all. It's a shame that Wikipedia is full of articles on non-notable bands. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 14:02, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 16:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.