Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Elisabeth, Duchess in Bavaria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:48, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Elisabeth, Duchess in Bavaria

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication of notability. The article is nothing more than a genealogical entry because the subject is a private individual who gets no coverage in the media, thus failing WP:GNG. Surtsicna (talk) 13:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree, no coverage. Balle010 (talk) 15:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 16:00, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Deposed monarchy cruft, not even sure about the notability of her husband, I'm having difficulty getting my head round the deposed Bavarian royal family. PatGallacher (talk) 19:50, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and the other comments above.Smeat75 (talk) 14:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I just removed 4 of the 5 sources (2 geneall.com, 1 genealogy.com, 1 luxarazzi.com), which leaves as sole source a Vogue piece on royal weddings in which (purportedly) her NN daughter's marriage to a NN banker is mentioned. JoelleJay (talk) 18:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
weak delete it reads more like a genealogy entry than an encyclopedia to me. Also, a WP:BLP so I'd err on removing it.Fred (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the royalty is out, it is not coming back, being a pretender to a dead throne is not a sign of notability, even less for spouses of pretenders.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. IMHO, nobility and their consorts need to be considered on a case by case basis. In this case, she is extremely unlikely to become either Queen of Scotland or of Bavaria, since neither country exists. However, it's not impossible that devolution and return of their respective monarchies could occur. Bearian (talk) 20:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.