Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Era Tak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GirthSummit _(blether) 10:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Era Tak

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional article that clearly fails WP:GNG. All of the references are to YouTube or Amazon (non-notable literary and fictional works of the subject which do not have any coverage in independent sources). Zoodino (talk) 05:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:01, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom -- Ab207 (talk) 20:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clear failure of WP:GNG Spiderone 17:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.