Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nickelodeon crossovers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Nickelodeon crossovers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is yet another example of WP:FANCRUFT dominating Wikipedia as this article also has had multiple issues dating back to March 2016 that, if fixed, wouldn’t be enough to save this article from deletion. Pahiy (talk) 23:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Pahiy (talk) 23:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation deletion discussions. Pahiy (talk) 23:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:20, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reluctantly support deletion. This has been sitting on my watchlist a long time, and it's clear to me that this is not a topic that has ever gotten enough independent coverage to become a viable standalone topic article. (The examples with enough sourcing belong at the topic-specific articles on those subjects.) And, worse, IPs keep trying to add more unsourced, and trivial, content to it. I don't believe this one will ever pass WP:GNG on its own. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - zero evidence of notability and original research Spiderone 13:29, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fancruft. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:41, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.