User talk:CNMall41

Light2021

Hello. I unblocked them on condition of non participation at AfD. Could you please briefly relate your concerns mentioned Here --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra:, how much time do you have? It's been long term abuse in relation to AfD nominations. I believe user was initially blocked for spam or had an article deleted (possibly was a sock at the time based on the comments in the AfD). After that, they have been on a deletion spree with nominations that contained no policy based reasons, defends them by saying they have a high percentage of deletions at AfD, then continues to engage in the same behavior. This goes back to 2016 and even had associated ANI reports.--CNMall41 (talk) 04:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Tony Kent

Hello,

I have received a message regarding my first article on wikipedia, which is a biography of myself. I have yet to add references but on last reading of the terms and conditions of wikipedia articles should be on someone of public note. I am a bestselling author in the UK, Germany, Italy, Poland and Russia. I had assumed that this would qualify.

Please could you advise me if, in those circumstances, my article will be removed. And if it will, how do I go about having a wikipedia article about myself, as every other major author seems to have?

Thanks you and apologies for my confusion.

Tonykentwrites (talk) 15:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

The first thing I would advise is reading through WP:COI and Wikipedia:Autobiography. These should help answer the unasked questions that need addressed first. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:55, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Winona Ryder on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Mona Lisa‎‎

I was a bit sharp earlier, um, sorry about that. Revert warring yes is not a good look, but I do think this can be resolved. Talk later. Ceoil (talk) 03:01, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Ceoil. Thank you for the message. It takes a big person to do that. I realize that you may be a little more emotionally connected since it is a topic you are passionate about. As far as the page itself, I know we can get things done (although at this point I am wishing I never saw the post on the fringe noticeboard lol). I am not always on the same page as BD, but they are pretty good when it comes to NPOV which is why I haven't been doing much editing to the page itself just yet. I just want to make sure it reads NPOV and not just the POV of one or a few of the experts. Thanks again for reaching out. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

CNMall41, the only people that were passionate abut the article were the SPI accounts, representing the current owners, that originally built the page to read that it was probably, defiantly by Leonardo. Both myself and especially Aza24 only want to get it to a neutral state so we can move on with our lives. That said, am impressed by the levels of diligence and research evident from the contribs of those coming in via the fringe noticeboard. Ceoil (talk) 23:51, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

I was thinking of your comment that "obv its a second hand knock off," which seems to be a personal sentiment. There are clearly people with more expertise than you or me who think it is by Leonardo, and of course there are people who think it is not. It's been pointed out to me that this sort of debate is going on with a lot of works claimed by some for Leonardo (there are even works that Kemp says are Leonardo with other experts saying no way). I agree, the page can't say that this is definitely by Leonardo, but neutrality doesn't mean reacting to that and taking the position that it definitely isn't, and belittling experts who think it is. It means saying that this is disputed, just like all the others with this kind of split.--CNMall41 (talk) 04:40, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lili Reinhart on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Young Living Aug 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.