Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James More

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Aafi (talk | contribs) at 19:27, 6 September 2020 (→‎James More: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 19:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

James More[edit]

James More (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with no external references. Rathfelder (talk) 22:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 22:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep sloppy nomination. There were already two "external references" and I easily added a third. Please read WP:BEFORE. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 12:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. Most of the hits are churnalism or in deprecated sources, but I did manage to find [1] and [2]. I tried to cut most of the outrageous promo from the article just now but there is probably some left. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 00:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.